What automation is good at
Reading fields consistently, re-checking arithmetic, spotting duplicates, matching against a supplier list, and never getting bored on invoice 240.
Most small and mid-sized finance teams do not need a new accounting platform. They need the retyping to stop. Below is how automated invoice processing actually works, where it breaks, and how we prove it on a sample of your documents before anyone signs up to a rollout.
An invoice lands in a shared mailbox. Someone opens it, reads the supplier and total, switches to the accounting package, types the header, types the lines, checks whether a purchase order exists, saves the PDF into a folder that follows nobody's naming convention, and forwards it for approval. Repeat a few hundred times a month. The cost is rarely one big number — it is attention taken away from work that needs a human.
Reading fields consistently, re-checking arithmetic, spotting duplicates, matching against a supplier list, and never getting bored on invoice 240.
Approving spend, resolving disputes, deciding how something is coded, and judging anything the system flags as uncertain.
Invoices arrive in one place — a shared mailbox, a scanner drop folder, or a supplier portal export. Nothing changes for the people sending them.
The document is classified and its fields extracted: supplier identity, invoice and PO numbers, dates, currency, line items, tax lines, totals.
Arithmetic is re-checked, the supplier is matched to your master list, the PO or delivery note is matched where one exists, and duplicates are flagged.
A person sees the invoice image beside the extracted values, with low-confidence fields highlighted. Approving is one action; correcting is inline.
The approved entry is written to your accounting or ERP system and the source document is archived with a link back to the entry.
Nothing posts without the review step. That single design decision is what makes the rest safe to automate.
We take one document type and a sample of invoices you have already processed by hand, build a working proof of concept, and compare its output to what your team actually entered. You get the numbers for your own documents, a running app to click through, and an honest read on the parts that are not ready. Client accounts open the full write-up, the screens and the live demo in the Coopsys Labs portal.
Start with a sample of invoicesIt is software that reads an incoming invoice — PDF, scan or email attachment — extracts the fields you care about (supplier, invoice number, dates, line items, tax, totals), matches it against your purchase orders or expected suppliers, and hands a prepared entry to a person for approval before anything is posted to your accounting system.
Classic OCR turns pixels into text and relies on fixed templates for each supplier layout. A model-based approach reads the document more like a person does, so a new supplier or a rearranged layout does not require a new template. You still need validation rules, because a confident-looking wrong number is worse than a blank field.
No. In every build we deliver, a person approves what gets posted. The work that disappears is retyping and chasing — not judgement, supplier relationships or month-end review.
It depends on your document mix, and that is exactly why we test on your own invoices rather than quote a number up front. The measurement that matters is how many invoices clear review untouched, and how quickly a reviewer can fix the rest.
We scope that with you before building. Options range from processing inside your existing cloud tenant to a self-contained deployment. Proofs of concept run on a redacted or limited sample unless you explicitly approve using live documents.
A narrow proof of concept is typically a matter of weeks, not quarters: one document type, one supplier group, one destination system, measured against invoices you already processed by hand.